Two complaints, both right:
1. QA sign-off was asking humans to OK trends + paid/organic without
anything visual to review — the dashboard wasn't built yet.
2. The QA panel just said "yes/no" and gave reviewers no specific
guidance on what they should be looking at.
Reordered the pipeline: after Stage 9 QA gates pass, immediately run
MoM compare (if prior_report_id) + Stage 10 Build, THEN park at
status=qa with the dashboard already rendered. Stage 10 has no Claude
cost (just file-copy + Vite build) so running it before sign-off costs
nothing meaningful, and the rationale "save spend if QA fails" never
actually applied — paid review work is already done by Stage 8.
QA panel rewrite:
- Big "Open dashboard ↗" button at the top
- Inline "What you're signing off" checklist split CM vs Strategist
(paid/organic + comments themes + sentiment risk on one side; trend
names + relevance + lens artefacts on the other)
- Removed the now-redundant Build button
- Second sign-off auto-completes the report; no extra click needed
- Status text walks them through the next action ("Open the dashboard,
walk through the views you're responsible for, then sign.")
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
98bcae6f31