diff --git a/backend/app/agents/brand_agent.py b/backend/app/agents/brand_agent.py
index 8812448..4494fb0 100755
--- a/backend/app/agents/brand_agent.py
+++ b/backend/app/agents/brand_agent.py
@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ RAG Status Guidelines:
 - **Red**: Significant brand guideline violations that must be fixed before use
 
 If the proof is nonsensical, not a marketing material, or cannot be analyzed, set analysisStatus to 'low_confidence'.
+
+**Response Format:**
+- Keep feedback brief and scannable
+- Use bullet points for each finding
+- Each bullet should be one actionable sentence
+- Start with the issue, then the recommendation
+- Example: "Logo placement incorrect (bottom-left) - move to top-right corner per guidelines"
 """
 
         # Use single-image or multi-image analysis depending on input
diff --git a/backend/app/agents/channel_agent.py b/backend/app/agents/channel_agent.py
index da50785..3d80b5e 100755
--- a/backend/app/agents/channel_agent.py
+++ b/backend/app/agents/channel_agent.py
@@ -80,6 +80,13 @@ RAG Status Guidelines:
 - **Red**: Significant technical issues that will impact display or accessibility
 
 If the proof is nonsensical, not a marketing material, or cannot be analyzed, set analysisStatus to 'low_confidence'.
+
+**Response Format:**
+- Keep feedback brief and scannable
+- Use bullet points for each finding
+- Each bullet should be one actionable sentence
+- Start with the issue, then the recommendation
+- Example: "Logo placement incorrect (bottom-left) - move to top-right corner per guidelines"
 """
 
         # Use single-image or multi-image analysis depending on input
diff --git a/backend/app/agents/lead_agent.py b/backend/app/agents/lead_agent.py
index 19ee5e1..251b13e 100755
--- a/backend/app/agents/lead_agent.py
+++ b/backend/app/agents/lead_agent.py
@@ -68,7 +68,12 @@ Your summary should:
 - For an 'Analysis Error' verdict, explain that the proof could not be reliably processed and has been logged for human review. Advise the user to try again with a revised proof.
 - For a 'Failed' status, highlight the critical 'Red' issues that must be addressed.
 - For a 'Passed' status, mention any 'Amber' areas for consideration, if they exist, while maintaining an encouraging tone.
-- Be professional, clear, and constructive.
+
+**Response Format:**
+- Start with a one-line verdict statement
+- List key issues as bullet points (max 3-5 bullets)
+- Each bullet: one sentence, actionable
+- For 'Passed': briefly note any amber items in 1-2 bullets
 
 Here are the specialist reviews:
 {self._format_reviews(reviews)}
diff --git a/backend/app/services/gemini_service.py b/backend/app/services/gemini_service.py
index 5454149..3ebb94b 100755
--- a/backend/app/services/gemini_service.py
+++ b/backend/app/services/gemini_service.py
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ class GeminiService:
                     },
                     "feedback": {
                         "type": "string",
-                        "description": "Constructive, professional feedback explaining the RAG status and highlighting both positive aspects and areas for improvement."
+                        "description": "Brief bullet-point feedback. Each bullet: one actionable sentence. Format: '• Issue: recommendation'. Max 5 bullets."
                     },
                     "issues": {
                         "type": "array",
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ class GeminiService:
                     },
                     "feedback": {
                         "type": "string",
-                        "description": "Constructive, professional feedback explaining the RAG status and highlighting both positive aspects and areas for improvement."
+                        "description": "Brief bullet-point feedback. Each bullet: one actionable sentence. Format: '• Issue: recommendation'. Max 5 bullets."
                     },
                     "issues": {
                         "type": "array",
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ class GeminiService:
                     },
                     "summary": {
                         "type": "string",
-                        "description": "A concise, professional summary explaining the overall status, based on the specialist reviews."
+                        "description": "Brief summary: one-line verdict, then 3-5 bullet points listing key issues/recommendations."
                     }
                 },
                 "required": ["overallStatus", "summary"]