New formatting_diff module compares span-level bold/italic/font/size/
color attributes between aligned page-pairs. Pure-Python; reads
PyMuPDF metadata already captured during ingest. Aggregates identical
flips into single findings and flags page-wide style shifts.
Powers the AXA document_diff fix for missed formatting changes that
the vision-LLM does not reliably detect.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds a 'color' field to each span dict extracted by
_extract_page_spans. Powers the upcoming deterministic
formatting-diff layer for AXA document_diff mode.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
New profile boots_ppack for QCing multi-page Boots production packs
(PowerPoint-exported PDFs, 4-18 pages each). Built on top of AXA's
document-mode infrastructure — branched off feature/axa-document-mode
because it reuses the dispatcher, ingest, and result writer.
New checks:
- boots_logo_compliance — three-path scoring (master wordmark / partner
lock-up / no branding) so OLIVER x BOOTS-style footer lock-ups aren't
scored against master wordmark rules. Conservative without a formal
Boots logo guideline.
- boots_colour_palette — verifies CMYK/RGB/Hex spec values on creative-
guidance pages against canonical Boots Blue / Health Primary Blue /
Offer Red, plus visual sanity-check on artwork pages.
Existing checks tuned:
- boots_brand_name_accuracy: closed-world list semantics. Brands not on
the approved list now go to names_not_on_list (manual review) instead
of failing — the list is sourced from the original 7 docs and is known
incomplete (Remington, Imodium, Maybelline etc. are legitimate Boots-
stocked brands not on it).
- boots_tandc_wording: explicit font-weight caveat — Boots Sharp Regular
vs Light isn't reliably distinguishable by vision LLM at small sizes.
Surfaced via font_weight_caveat field + needs_manual_check value.
Page classifier (document_mode/page_classifier.py):
Heuristic tags each page as cover / checklist / palette / notes /
artwork. Validated on all 10 sample packs.
Strict-grade exemption (Profile.strict_grade flag):
Only artwork-classified pages count towards Pass/Fail. Cover, checklist,
palette, and notes pages are still QC'd and reported as Informational
but cannot trigger a Fail. Banner shows exactly which artwork-page
checks fell below 6.
Result writer extended:
- Per-page table with score + page_type pill for any page_each-scope
check (auto-applied as fallback)
- Strict-grade banner (red on violation, green when clean)
- Page_type pills throughout the per-page strip
Smoke-test result (Remington 4-page pack, 2026-05-05):
Overall 70.75/100, strict-grade Fail. After two iterations of prompt
tuning, all three remaining strict-grade violations are real catches:
orphan asterisk in T&Cs, "they may not be stocked" wording deviation,
missing "Charges may apply". brand_name_accuracy 7.0 (was 3.0 before
list fix), logo_compliance 9.5 (was 1.5 before lock-up path fix).
Local-only — not pushed to dev or merged to develop until after Boots
show-and-tell. Same posture as feature/axa-document-mode.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
